Quality Control Assessment of Diagnostic X-Ray Units in Zanzibar, Tanzania
Suleiman Ameir Suleiman *
Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission, Radiation Control Directorate P.O BOX 2555, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Salum Kombo Salum
Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission, Radiation Control Directorate P.O BOX 2555, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Ebenezer Kimaro
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Division of Science, Technology and Innovation, P.O BOX, 10, Dodoma,Tanzania.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Regular execution of quality control (QC) tests in medical diagnostic X-ray units is primarily important to provide high-quality images and proper diagnoses with least hazard. The performance criteria in diagnostic radiology in Zanzibar Islands, Tanzania were followed in accordance with the QC guidelines, and the values of the measured parameters were compared with the tolerance limits. The study was designed to perform QC tests on the diagnostic X-ray units in governmental and private hospitals. In this study six QC tests (beam alignment, beam collimation, kV reproducibility, half-value layer (HVL), mAs linearity and kV accuracy) were carried out by using beam alignment tool and Unfors non-invasive X-ray test device (Xi R/F&MAM detector). The measured parameters were conducted in two periods, from 2017 to 2018 (14 X-ray units were considered) and from 2019 to 2020 (16 X-ray units were considered). In both periods, the QC test results indicated that 100% of the X-ray units had acceptable HVL≥ 2.3 mm Al at 80 kVp. In the first period (2017−2018), the QC results showed that 78.57% and 85.71% had acceptable beam alignment (≤3% of the focus to image distance) and beam collimation (≤ ± 2 cm). Of the X-ray units evaluated, 85.71% had tolerable kV reproducibility of 5%, and 71.43% had mAs linearity within the tolerance limit of 10%, whereas 85.71% had acceptable kV accuracy within the tolerance limit of 5%. In the second period (2019−2020), the tolerance limits of X-ray units exceeded by 8.04% for kV reproducibility, 8.04% for kV accuracy, 16.07% for mAs linearity, 8.93% for beam alignment and 8.04% for beam collimation. The exceeded tolerance limits could be attributed to the new X-ray units which have full support of service agreements signed during the second period and increase of the compliances with the Tanzania Atomic Energy Act. No 7 of 2003 and its regulations. Results obtained highlight the need to regularly carry out comprehensive QC tests together with routine equipment maintenance.
Keywords: Diagnostic X-ray unit, quality control, image quality, diagnostic image.