Negative Velocity Characteristics in Electromagnetism

Zhi-Xun Huang *

Communication University of China, Beijing, China.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Newton mechanics is great, Newton's contribution is indelible. But from Newton's classical mechanics, the definition of velocity (=) must mean that this physical parameter is a vector, so "negative velocity" only means the opposite direction of motion, no other meaning. It is difficult to understand negative velocity within the framework of classical mechanics. However, wave is a special form of material motion, wave mechanics has a unique method and meaning, and its concept and connotation are significantly different from classical mechanics. For example, wave velocity (whether phase velocity or group velocity) is a scalar quantity. "Negative wave velocity" does not mean that the direction of motion is reversed, but a special phenomenon that does not accord with causality from the surface view. In any case, research in recent decades has shown that negative wave velocity is not only theoretically possible, it has also been repeatedly shown to exist experimentally. Moreover, negative wave velocity is a special form of superluminal speed; The wave with negative velocity is the advanced wave. It corresponds to the leading solution of the basic equation of electromagnetic field and electromagnetic wave. The past practice (discarding the advanced solution) is wrong! As for causality, scientists have provided a new definition and interpretation. In short, both wave mechanics and quantum optics take a different approach from classical mechanics.

This paper points out that it is unusual for the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics to be awarded to Alain Aspect and two others, since Aspect's experiments on the Bell inequality were completed in 1982, Which still stands today as a crucial experiment that proved Einstein's EPR paper wrong and quantum mechanics (QM) correct. Aspect's award in 2022 showed that mainstream physical community had been forced to accept that quantum entanglement existed and that the "light-speed limit" theory of SR was a mistake.

This paper discusses the proposition "negative characteristic motion of electromagnetic wave" put forward by the author in 2013, pointing out that it is an inherent physical phenomenon reflecting symmetry in nature. In this paper, the faster-than-light motion of waves found in the near-field of antennas is discussed. In addition, the realizability of "time travel" is also discussed.

Keywords: Negative wave velocity, negative group velocity, advanced solution, advanced wave, superluminal, near region field, causality


How to Cite

Huang , Z.-X. (2023). Negative Velocity Characteristics in Electromagnetism. Physical Science International Journal, 27(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.9734/psij/2023/v27i1776

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Born M, Wolf E. Principle of Optics. Cambridge Univ. Press; 1999.

Einstein A. Jahr der Radioaktivit und Elektronik. 1907;4:411-461

Sommerfeld A. Ann. Phys. 1914;44(1): 177-182

Brillouin L. Wave propagation and group velocity. Academic Press; 1960.

Wheeler J, Feynman R. Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of Radiation Rev. Mod. Phys. 1945;17(2-3): 157-181

Budko N. Observation of Locally Negative Velocity of the Electromagnetic Field in Free SpacePhys. Rev. Lett. 2009; 102(020401):1-4

Huang ZX. Jour. of Communication Univ(Natural Sci.). 2013;20(4):1-15

Huang ZX. Introduction to the theory of waveguide below cutoff. China Metrology Press; 1991.

Wynne K, et al. Opt. Communication. 2000; 176:429-435.

Wynne K, Jaroszynski D. Opt. Lett. 1999; 24(1):25~27.

Davies P. About Time. Havard Univ Press; 1998.

Garrett C, McCumber D. Phys. Rev. A, 1970;1(2):305~313

Chu S, Wong S. Linear pulse propagation in an absorbing medium. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1982;48(1):738-741.

Hache A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002;80(3): 518-520

Munday J, Robertson W, Negative group velocity pulse tunneling through a coaxial photonic crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002; 81(11):2127-2129

Huang ZX, et al. Engineering Science. 2003;1(2):35~39

Zhou W, Li ZC. Jour. of Beijing Institute of Petro-Chemical Tech. 2009;17(3): 48-53

Yao HY, Chang TH. Prog. EM Res. 2012; 122:1-13.

Huang ZX, Jiang R. Frontier Science. 2014; 8(1):54-68

Wang LJ, et al. Nature. 2000;406: 277-279

Stenner M. Nature. 2003;425:695~698.

Gehring G, et al. Science. 2006;312:895-897.

Zhang L, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011; 107(9):1-5

Glaser R, et al. arXiv: 1204. 0810, vl[quant. phi]; 2012

Enders A, Nimtz G. On superluminal barrier traversal. Jour. Phys. France. 1992; (2):1693-1698

Nimtz G, Hertman W. Prog. Quant. Electr. 1997;21(2):81-108.

Huang ZX. Journal of Communication Univ (Natural Science). 2015;22(5):1~8

Tzontchev R. arXiv: phys. 10010036 vI[phys. class-ph]; 2000.

Kholmetskii A. Jour. Appl. Phys. 2007;101: 023532 1-11

Kholmetskii A. Jour. Appl. Phys. 2007;102: 013529 1-12

Missevitch O, et al. Euro. Phys. Lett. 2011; 91:64004 1-5

Sangro R, et. al. Ann. d Phys., 2014;44(1): 177-182

Fan J Jour. of Commnunication Univ. (Natural Science), 2013;20(2):64~67

Carniglia C, Mendal L. Phys. Rev. 1971; 3(2):280-296

Ali S. Phys. Rev. D. 1973;7(6):1668-1674.

Stahlhofen A, Mimtz G. Euro. Phys. Lett. 2006;76(2):189-192.

Einstein A. Ann. d Phys. 1905;17(7): 891-895

Huang ZX. Jour. of communication Univ. (Natural Science). 2021;28(5):71-82.

Brillouin L. Ann. Phys. 1914;44(1): 203-208

Huang ZX. Current Jour. of Appl. Sci. & Tech. 2021;40(35):61-77.

Ulbrich R, Fehrenbach G. Phys.Rev. Lett. 1979;43(13):963-966.

Zhang YZ. Physics. 2001;30(8):456-460

Zhang YD. Progress of quantum mechanics. Science Press; 2009.

Liu L. Knowledge of modern physics. 2002; 14(1):27-29

Mullins J. New Scientist. 2010;20:34-37.

Tetrode H, Zeit F. Phys., 1922;10:317.

Smith D, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000; 84(18):4184~4187.

Veselago V. Soviet Phys. USP. 1968;10(4): 509-514.

Huang ZX. Current Jour. of Appl. Sci. & Tech. 2022;40(35):25~48.

Poincarè H. Archiv Neerland des Sci et Nature, Ser 2, 1900, 5: 252~278; also: Bulletin Sci. Math. 1904;28:302-324.

Lorentz H. Proc. Sec. Sci. Koninklijke Akad. van Wetenschappen (Armsterdam). 1904; 6:809-831

Ma QP. Inquiry into the self-constancy of relativity logic. Shanghai Scientific Literature Press; 2004.

Ma QP. The theory of relativity. Nova Pub; 2013.

Einstein A, et al. Phys. Rev. 1935;47: 777-780

Bell J. Physics. 1964;1:195~200; also: Rev. Mod. Phys. 1965;38:447-452.

Aspect A, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1981;47: 460~465; also: Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982;49: 91-96.

Salart D, et al. Nature. 2008;454:861-864

Huang ZX. Wave science and superluminal light physics. National Defense Industry Press; 2014.

Huang ZX. Light of physics—Open physical thought. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press; 2022.