Phase Change Materials for Passive Cooling of Sahelian Buildings: Integration Options and a Screening Assessment for Niger
Moumouni Guero Mohamed *
Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Polytech Mardi, Dan Dicko Dankoulodo University of Maradi, Maradi, Niger, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Technics, Dan Dicko Dankoulodo University of Maradi, Maradi, Niger and InnovaTech-Smart Energies, Consulting and Expertise Firm, Maradi, Niger.
Mousbahou Mahamane Nana Farida
Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Technics, Dan Dicko Dankoulodo University of Maradi, Maradi, Niger.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aims: The study aims to synthesise phase change material (PCM) classification and building-envelope integration techniques relevant to hot, arid climates, and to carry out a comparative techno-economic and environmental assessment of three candidate PCMs (a paraffin, a hydrated salt, and a water-urea eutectic) for passive thermal regulation of housing in Niger.
Study Design: Structured literature synthesis combined with a multi-criteria scoring assessment adapted from established PCM-selection methodology.
Methodology: Published thermophysical, economic and environmental data for the three PCMs were consolidated from the underlying laboratory/simulation study and cross-checked against the wider PCM building-envelope literature. Five techno-economic criteria (cost-effectiveness, durability, ease of maintenance, local availability, thermal stability) and five environmental criteria (embodied energy, carbon footprint, biodegradability, end-of-life recyclability, environmental risk) were each scored from 1 (least favourable) to 5 (most favourable) and combined into an unweighted composite index; an annualised areal cost was additionally computed from unit price, indicative areal loading and expected service life.
Results: Niger's electricity access rate (about 20% in 2023) is far below the sub-Saharan African average (about 53%) and the global figure (about 92%), underlining the case for passive rather than mechanical cooling. The water-urea eutectic scored highest on the techno-economic index (3.9/5) and on the environmental index (4.6/5), driven by low cost and local sourceability, but had the shortest expected service life (5-10 years); paraffin scored lowest on cost-effectiveness and on the environmental index (1.9/5) despite the best durability and thermal stability scores; the hydrated salt occupied an intermediate position throughout. Annualised areal cost, however, favoured paraffin's long service life enough to narrow the gap with water-urea considerably.
Conclusion: No single material dominates across all criteria, which argues against a one-size-fits-all recommendation. Paraffin suits applications where dynamic thermal performance and longevity are prioritised and where the budget allows; the water-urea eutectic suits cost- and carbon-constrained, shorter-horizon retrofits using locally available inputs; and the hydrated salt is a reasonable compromise where corrosion risk can be managed. These results give Nigerien designers and policymakers a first quantitative, climate-specific basis for PCM selection, ahead of the full life-cycle assessments that scaled deployment will eventually require.
Keywords: Phase change materials, passive cooling, building envelope, screening assessment, multi-criteria decision making, Sahel, Niger, Maradi, thermal energy storage